Archive for July, 2006
Adventuring
Posted by Tony Hatter in Angry Rants on July 21st, 2006
Somebody show Pat Robertson a picture of himself with his eyes closed. While he’s praying on television, closing his eyes makes his forehead look twice as big as it already is.
As you might have guessed, out of boredom this morning, I sat through the 700 Club. Pat Robertson closed his eyes and bared his forhead for the world to see, but more importantly, the girl (can’t remember her name, and can’t be bothered to spend the thirty seconds looking it up) interviewed the author (can’t remember blah, blah, can’t be bothered blah, blah) of a book called “Techinical Virginity” it had a subtitle too (you get the drill by now) but the gist of it is that with the rash of misguided (my description) parents forcing their teen, and even pre-teen children to sign virginity pledges, the number of “technical virgins” (girls who will do pretty much anything but “go all the way” (as the author put it)) has grown alarmingly (her word) high. Children are learning from these virginity pledges that sex before marriage is not okay, but nobody is teaching them what exactly qualifies as sex.
Here is where her opinions (stated alarmingly as hard facts) and mine diverge. She starts talking about how sexual options today are far more numerous than in the past. Oral sex, she claims, was first introduced to most Americans with the Monica Lewinsky scandal just a decade ago. Now I haven’t really been around too long in the grand scheme of things, but if I were forced to guess, I would say that Monica Lewinsky didn’t introduce the blow job to America. And not only that, but she says that girls aren’t any more “to blame” for increased sexual activity among teenagers than the boys, but that they play complimentary roles. The girls, she says, get the boys thinking by dressing provocatively. When a boy sees a girl’s cleavage or belly, since boys (i.e. not girls) are “sexually minded creatures”, he thinks about sex. And now that the girl has gotten the boy’s mind rolling, he turns into the (one-eyed) serpent, tempting the poor innocent (my injected sarcasm) little teenage girl to put the apple in her mouth (so to speak).
Let me lay this out really simple. Girl arouses boy, boy gets aroused, boy convinces girl, girl pleases boy. She says nothing, except that it doesn’t exist, of the girl’s pleasure. She said, outright, that if the girls were to look at what they were getting out of the situation, they would stop having sex until they were married and ready to have children. These sound like the words of a woman who has never had an orgasm. She’s trying to teach girls that if they are not married and getting pregnant that sex is just something that boys will convince a girl to do for their own enjoyment without any payoff for her. Now, as far as I can tell, women enjoy sex just as much as men do; or at least not any less than we do, as a general rule (with exceptions obviously).
And I’m not really going to get into this one, but faced with the problem of not wanting to demonize sex to a point where kids grow up and get married, but still can’t have sex because they’ve been raised to think it’s a dirty horrible thing, she said that it’s important not to do that because, “sex is a beautiful thing created for marriage”. Now, I inserted the emphasis myself, but, if I heard her right, she seems to think that marriage came before sex? Isn’t that taking the chicken v. egg controversy and ruling in favor of the omelette?
But enough teeing off on the 700 Club, I want to talk about adventuring. I’ve verbicised that wonderfully fun noun and turned it into a sport. Not an extreme sport you might find in the X Games next year, or a sport requiring any skill which will eventually turn into a multi-billion dollar a year industry, but more of the weekend warrior type sport. The type of sport that you can be doing no matter what you’re doing.
Sorry, I’m being cryptic. Basically, I’ve discovered that anything is more fun if you put the word adventure in front of it. Hence, the recent proliferation of “Adventure Spas”. Basically, my sport of adventuring consists of calling whatever you’re doing an adventure. When I go for a walk with the dog, we’re not on a walk, we’re on an adventure walk. When I run to the store to buy milk, I’m adventure shopping. When I pass out on the couch watching TV, I’m adventure napping. It gives a kind of Zen-like feeling of accomplishment to whatever you do. Adventure Blogging; the new official sport of the internet.
What’s the deal with emo?
Posted by Tony Hatter in Music on July 18th, 2006
I like the Killers. (They aren’t emo, but stay with me here) I don’t like Vegas. To echo a sentiment borrowed from a friend who feels the same way about the Killers and Las Vegas as I do, having experienced first-hand the anemic cultural situation of the city, we want very badly to pull for any band to climb up out of the filth and become successful. We both want very badly for Panic! at the Disco to be good. Aside from their asinine name (band names in general are getting so bad lately that you can’t really fault any single band for their name because you know somebody has a worse name) and one other quality, I really do like them. They have extremely large amounts of potential to be a great band. If only they could quit their emo posturing. Emo as a subculture has reached an accelerated demise at the hands of myspace. It has acquired the dress code, sexuality, and dis-intellectualization that upgrade the sub-culture to a (marginal) mainstream cultural movement. Punk fell victim to the same painful living death in the mid-eighties, Metal in the early nineties, and grunge in the mid-late nineties. Hate me if you will but the progression does roughly go punk-metal-grunge-emo. But hear this first, the end (current point) of that progression represents the falling-off. It was okay when disenchanted poor kids from Seattle were screaming about being hungry, but things started going downhill once angry rich kids from the suburbs started whining about being sexually confused because Hilary Duff won’t sing into his microphone (wink wink) ’till they get married. (Thank you Good Charlotte) And this isn’t going anywhere productive so I’ll “end it on this” sexual innuendo.
P.S. Anya, on 94.9 is one of the few female DJs on the radio here in SD, but she is the only DJ that I know of (guys included) with the balls to play Dead Kennedys. Yay Anya, and yay California Uber Alles.